IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz and his neighbors settled a bitter legal dispute over the private road they share just hours before trial was set to begin Tuesday, attorneys for both sides confirmed.
The deal settles a years-long case in which the nation's longest-tenured college football coach and his wife faced claims that their extensive efforts to guard their privacy came at the expense of the three other families living along Saddle Club Road outside Iowa City.
Neighbors sued after the couple refused to join their homeowners association, ignored a $9,500 assessment for road repairs, and erected privacy fencing, trees and landscaping along the road in a shared easement.
Ferentz -- who has long been Iowa's highest-paid public employee and is expected to earn $5.2 million this year -- was expected to testify during the trial.
Details of the settlement weren't released. Attorney Adam Tarr, who represents the neighbors and their homeowners association, said the deal calls for the parties to dismiss the litigation within 30 days and record new association bylaws and property agreements governing their relationship.
"Our clients are happy with the result and look forward to working with the Ferentzes instead of against them," Tarr said.
Mark Roberts, an attorney for the Ferentzes, said his clients were also pleased, adding: "The neighbors will all be glad to resolve this matter without a trial."
Tarr had argued in a pre-trial court filing that the Ferentzes were "literally free-riders" because they hadn't paid anything since 2009 for maintaining the road they drive daily and share with their neighbors.
The attorney noted that over two decades, neighbors had sought to subdivide their property, to create a turnabout to protect children from traffic and asked the couple to honor their 2001 promise to join a homeowners association to pay for road repairs. Tarr said the Ferentzes treated the requests with "resistance, objection, passive aggression, intimidation, and outright hostility."
The neighbors' 2016 lawsuit contended that the Ferentzes refused to join the association despite having agreed to do so in a 2001 agreement, which settled an earlier dispute over a proposed subdivision. The neighbors also argued that the Ferentzes violated an easement agreement by erecting the fencing, planting evergreen trees and installing landscaping that encroached onto the commonly owned roadway and nearby utility easement.
The Ferentzes noted they had opposed the 2003 paving of the gravel road, saying it has brought more speeders and "stalkers and gawkers" outside their home. They say that they couldn't be forced to join the association because its scope went beyond what they agreed to in 2001.
A judge ruled in September that the Ferentzes weren't required to join the association. Tuesday's trial was scheduled to determine whether the Ferentzes would be required to remove or trim landscaping and whether the couple should pay damages for any alleged easement violations, including football-related meetings in which many cars would park on the road.
Ferentz had been advised by his predecessor, Hayden Fry, to live outside Iowa City and "build a moat."
"While they may desire a moat between themselves and the outside world, the Ferentzes cannot appropriate the right-of-way easement, up to and into the Roadway surface -- as their personal rampart," Tarr wrote in a filing.
Roberts argued that any alleged violations of the easement didn't interfere with the roadway and couldn't be enforced.