Bethune-Cookman Wildcats @ Jackson State Tigers
12-14, 7-6 SWAC
60
12-14, 7-6 SWAC
Final
| 1 | 2 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
BCU | 24 | 36 | 60 |
JKST | 32 | 29 | 61 |
12-14, 8-5 SWAC
61
12-14, 8-5 SWAC
Game Leaders
Team Stats
42% (22-52)
Field Goal %
43% (19-44)
21% (4-19)
Three Point %
43% (6-14)
92% (12-13)
Free Throw %
65% (17-26)
14
Turnovers
12
30
Rebounds
28
4
Largest Lead
10
Game Information
Jackson, MS
Referee:Patrick Evans
Referee:Joe Wilbert III
Referee:Alfred Smith
Team Stats
 | | |
|---|---|---|
| FG | 22-52 | 19-44 |
| Field Goal % | 42 | 43 |
| 3PT | 4-19 | 6-14 |
| Three Point % | 21 | 43 |
| FT | 12-13 | 17-26 |
| Free Throw % | 92 | 65 |
| Rebounds | 30 | 28 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 9 | 7 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 21 | 21 |
| Assists | 9 | 7 |
| Steals | 9 | 8 |
| Blocks | 4 | 0 |
| Total Turnovers | 14 | 12 |
| Points Off Turnovers | 7 | 20 |
| Fast Break Points | 7 | 3 |
| Points in Paint | 32 | 22 |
| Fouls | 21 | 11 |
| Technical Fouls | 0 | 1 |
| Flagrant Fouls | 0 | 0 |
| Largest Lead | 4 | 10 |
2025-26 Standings
NCAA Division I
| Southwestern Athletic Conference | CONF | GB | OVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida A&M | 5-1 | - | 8-9 |
| Bethune-Cookman | 5-1 | - | 8-11 |
| Jackson State | 4-2 | 1 | 5-14 |
| Arkansas-Pine Bluff | 4-3 | 1.5 | 7-13 |
| Alabama A&M | 3-3 | 2 | 10-9 |
| Southern | 3-3 | 2 | 7-12 |
| Alabama State | 3-3 | 2 | 6-13 |
| Prairie View A&M | 3-4 | 2.5 | 8-12 |
| Texas Southern | 3-4 | 2.5 | 5-13 |
| Grambling | 2-3 | 2.5 | 8-10 |
| Alcorn State | 2-4 | 3 | 3-15 |
| Mississippi Valley State | 0-6 | 5 | 1-19 |
Men's College Basketball News
AP men's college basketball Top 25 poll breakdown
The latest top-25 poll is out, continuing to feature all three unbeaten teams. What's next for the ranked teams?
33m
Unbeatens: Arizona still tops, Nebraska No. 5 in AP men's poll
Arizona remains No. 1 in the AP Top 25 men's basketball poll, while fellow unbeaten Nebraska hit a program-best No. 5.
6m
Joe Lunardi's men's Bracketology March Madness watch guide
A look at the storylines and games that could affect the projected field of 68.
2h