INDIANAPOLIS -- The leaders of the College Football Playoff again failed to come to an agreement about expanding the current four-team field, but they didn't entirely rule out the possibility it could still happen before the end of the current 12-year contract, which runs through the 2025 season.
Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby, as he left the meeting Monday morning, just hours before kickoff of the College Football Playoff National Championship Game presented by AT&T, said the 10 FBS commissioners voted, but "didn't even get close to unanimity."
"There are big enough [issues] that remain that we have a lot of work to do," he said. "I am disappointed. ... There's holdouts for four, there's holdouts for eight, there's holdouts for 12. It's been a frustrating process."
Beyond the number of teams, there continues to be disagreement in the room about revenue distribution, bowl games and whether the Power 5 conference champions should be given automatic bids. Mississippi State president Mark Keenum, the chair of the CFP's board of managers, said the commissioners presented the 11 presidents and chancellors with a 12-team proposal, but the presidents did not take an official vote.
Still, he said he remains optimistic about expansion, and said the commissioners will meet again in a few weeks to continue their discussions.
"I think we're going to get there," Keenum said. "I think that there's a commitment on the part of our commissioners that we're going to move forward to come up with an expansion for college football. And you know, time is something that we recognize that we need to move as quickly as we can. ... We still have four years remaining, but we obviously want to make a decision well before that. And I know that everyone had arrived here in hopes that we could come to a decision here at this meeting, but we still have some more work to do."
The Pac-12 released a statement Monday evening that said the league supports all of the six most discussed models that would allow for expansion to occur before the current contract ends. The league's statement is the first to publicly detail the six models the commissioners have considered, including three variations of an eight-team format:
• Qualification for the best 12 teams;
• Automatic qualifications (AQs) for the six highest-ranked conference champions and six at-large bids, which was the original June proposal;
• AQs for the Power 5 conferences and one AQ for the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, along with six at-large bids ("5+1+6");
• Qualification for the best eight teams;
• AQs for the six highest-ranked conference champions and two at-large bids ("6+2");
• AQs for the Autonomy Five conferences and one AQ for the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, along with two at-large bids ("5+1+2").
"It is clear none of the six most-discussed expansion models has unanimous consent, with most having considerable opposition, and every conference other than the Pac-12 has indicated that they would be against at least one of the proposed models," the statement read. "If all 11 CFP members are unable to agree unanimously on a new format, then no expansion can occur in the current term, and our collective focus must turn to expansion immediately following the current term. The CFP has confirmed that we have another two years before we would need to come to agreement on an expanded format that could begin immediately after the current term ends."
For three straight days, the 10 FBS commissioners and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick met in a ballroom on the third floor of the JW Marriott in downtown Indianapolis, tucked away from the Alabama and Georgia fans there to see the eighth national championship game in the CFP era and the second in that span featuring two SEC teams.
The grandiose hotel was otherwise buzzing with fans, media, agents and athletic administrators, but few if any realized the future of the sport's postseason was being decided at the end of a long hallway blocked by a security guard. More than a dozen reporters lingered for the conclusion of Monday's closed-door meeting of the presidents and chancellors, which happens annually before every national championship game. It was the culmination of eight months of conversations and debates about the 12-team proposal that was made public on June 10 -- a total of nine in-person meetings, including Monday's gathering with the 11 presidents and chancellors who have the ultimate authority over the CFP.
Their discussions Monday -- just hours before the biggest game of the year -- prolonged what has been a painstaking process for fans who have long clamored for a more inclusive system.
"It's not simple," Keenum said. "And you get down into the details ... for the average layperson, if you will, a sports fan, why not 12 teams; 16 to 32 teams, whatever team, how big a deal is there? Well, you get into the specifics, and I have a whole new appreciation for that as well. After I've been involved in this process, looking at all the legalities, all the complex matters that have to be resolved. And that's what we're going through. It's not just one school or one conference. You've got nationwide, all across the country, conferences that have a stake in this."
There have been multiple obstacles in preventing a consensus, but the commissioners entered the meetings on Saturday in disagreement about whether the Power 5 leagues should receive automatic bids in a new format. The original proposal recommended the field comprise the six highest-ranked conference champions, and the next six highest-ranked teams.
It's unclear who was the first person to raise the issue of automatic qualifiers -- multiple sources have said it was former Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott before his tenure ended, but the idea was quickly dismissed at the time. Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren had since stated publicly that he was in favor of it, citing the difficulty of a Big Ten schedule as the reason its champion deserved a spot in the playoff. Others, mostly from the Group of 5 -- a label they detest -- argued that autonomous stature is an NCAA designation that was never intended to be used as a competitive advantage. If the Power 5 champions were going to get in automatically, they argued privately, why weren't the others allowed the same benefit?
None of them, though, spoke to the media following their meetings on Saturday and Sunday.
Warren told a small group of reporters after the meetings ended, "I've made my point really clear on why I feel that way. There's a whole list of items that we just need to kind of work through. I just I just feel strongly with our conference, the difficulty of our schedule, the demands of our schedule, and going back to what was developed, even originally. I wasn't in the room, but I heard it was originally that the conference champions should be given a lot of credit, and so I'm just following that. That's important."
When asked what if they couldn't come to a consensus on that issue, Warren said, "That's why we have to keep meeting, but that's not the only issue. We have to keep working on it."
Warren wouldn't say whether he felt a sense of urgency, reiterating repeatedly that they had to get this right. But he also shared Keenum's optimism that eventually they would work out an agreement.
"From my standpoint, I can't speak for everyone else, it's to be thoughtful, to keep our student-athletes' health and wellness, mental and physical, to ask ourselves what's right for college football, and do what's right. So when we feel like we have that answer, then I think we'll have the answer."
As for the process taking longer than perhaps anticipated, since the expansion plan was revealed in June, Warren said, "Things take time. I was not looking for a quick fix. I'm not saying that this was but, I think we have to remain patient and do the right thing. These are complex issues, and I think we would not be performing at the level that we need to perform if this was a very quick decision and if it wasn't complex, because it is."
The lack of transparency in the process was questioned Sunday by New York Times reporter Billy Witz.
"Well," Hancock said Sunday, "mostly because they're not finished."
They're still not.
"We have entrenched issues," Bowlsby said, "and they're no closer to being resolved than they were before."
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said he initially walked past reporters following the meeting because he had to "reset" his "mental frame and then have a conversation responsibly."
"I've never genuinely assumed that this would just be a rubber stamp," he said. "But I also know that when issues are identified, there has to be a resolve to work to solutions, and there have to be solutions identified. If you can't do it, we can't do it. I don't know if anybody's noticed, but we're doing very well in the current system, and I'm more than willing to continue forward. In certain ways, it seems that's where others have decided we are. Many of those others were the ones who called for expansion three years ago. Vocally, publicly, and attempted to provide motivation."
Sankey was one of four members of a subcommittee who developed the original 12-team proposal, along with Swarbrick, Mountain West commissioner Craig Thompson and Bowlsby.
"We're being asked to consider some things that are substantial direction changes," he said. "I don't know that our membership's there. I'm being told by others that their membership can't accept certain things. Are we, you know, in a standoff? I don't think so. I'm willing to work through that. If we don't decide soon, the decision is still ahead. That's the square one. We're not able to move now. We have to go through this anyway, looking ahead at what's for proverbially now this Year 13."
ESPN's Andrea Adelson contributed to this report.